<div>First off, I LOVE this program. I use it for just about everything I can because of the seamless transition from design / simulation to publication quality figure insertion.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I'm just curious about something. I can currently generate fully functional SPICE netlists and have built up quite a robust library of sources and parts from various vendors with only minor PSPICE corrections. However, I am currently trying to use XCircuit to do some mixed-signal modeling and am having a difficult time generating the proper XSPICE syntax from the 'spice' line.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>For instance, I have the following information on my example inverter symbol:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Standard SPICE:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>XCircuit Output from Symbol -</div>
<div>spice:xinv%i %pin %pout my_inverter</div>
<div>spice:.model my_inverter inv(blah blah blah)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>SPICE netlist -</div>
<div>xinv1 input output my_inverter</div>
<div>.model my_inverter inv(blah blah blah)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>For XSPICE, I have to deal with behavioral nodes which are vectorized [nodes must be in brackets] as shown below:</div>
<div> </div>
<div>XSPICE netlist -</div>
<div>ainv1 [logic_input] [logic_output] xspice_inverter</div>
<div>.model xspice_inverter inv1(blah blah blah)</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I have tried every possible permutation imaginable on the %p pin designation to get the brackets included in the output. If this is possible, I would be very thankful if someone would show me how.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Thanks in advance,</div>
<div>M. Jackson</div>